
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All" you accept this and consent that we share this information with third parties and that your data may be processed in the USA. For more information, please read our .
You can adjust your preferences at any time. If you deny, we will use only the essential cookies and unfortunately, you will not receive any personalized content.

If you've walked through a checkpoint at San Francisco International or Kansas City recently, there's a good chance the person scanning your bag wasn't a federal employee. Most travelers have no idea that's already happening at some U.S. airports through a little-known program that allows private contractors to run security operations under TSA oversight. That's how the existing Screening Partnership Program works. TSA Gold+ is the next step, and it just got a lot more real.
TSA officially launched the TSA Gold+ program in May 2026, and on May 15, the agency posted a formal pre-solicitation notice on SAM.gov, the federal contracting database. In other words, this is no longer just an internal policy discussion or a vague modernization idea. It is now an active procurement process complete with a draft Performance Work Statement, evaluation criteria, and an Industry Day at TSA headquarters in Springfield, Virginia, scheduled for May 21.
Image Source: Offical TSA Gold+ Website
The core idea is fairly straightforward: private contractors would take over not just airport security staffing, but also the technology itself. Under the existing Screening Partnership Program, TSA owns the screening equipment while private companies provide the workforce. Under Gold+, the contractor would handle both, including procurement, deployment, tech upgrades, and ongoing maintenance, while TSA continues setting security standards and maintaining regulatory oversight.
The financial pressure behind this push is difficult to ignore. Passenger volume has grown roughly 28 percent over the past decade, with TSA screening 906 million passengers in 2025 alone, while the officer workforce has grown only about 8 percent. At the same time, equipment maintenance costs have roughly doubled, reaching an estimated $600 million in 2026. A major pay raise for officers in 2023 added further strain to the agency's budget. Then came the recent government shutdowns, which hit TSA especially hard. Workers at federally operated checkpoints missed nearly $1 billion in paychecks this fiscal year, while screeners at the 20 privately operated SPP airports continued getting paid because their contracts were already funded. That contrast has become a major part of the conversation around Gold+.
Honestly, probably not much at first for most travelers.
Federal security standards apply regardless of who operates the checkpoint. The rules travelers already know, shoes, liquids, laptops, all of that, are set by federal law, not by whoever happens to be staffing the lane. TSA would still conduct inspections, audits, and certification of all screening equipment and procedures, so from a passenger perspective, the experience would likely feel very familiar.
Where travelers might notice a difference is the uniforms. At airports already using private screeners, officers wear their contracting company's gear instead of TSA blues. Beyond that, though, the checkpoint process itself generally looks and functions the same way it does at federally staffed airports.
The bigger changes would happen behind the scenes. The real focus of Gold+ is how quickly new screening technology gets deployed, how equipment is maintained, and who controls decisions around upgrades and modernization. The program is specifically designed to replace what TSA calls "lengthy technology procurement refresh cycles" with a faster, more private-sector-driven model. Right now, TSA's timeline for fully upgrading older baggage screening systems to newer CT scanning technology stretches well into the 2040s under the standard federal budgeting process. Gold+ is essentially a bet that private investment and long-term contracts can accelerate that timeline considerably.
No specific Gold+ participants have been publicly confirmed yet, and the program remains voluntary for airports.
The 20 airports already participating in the Screening Partnership Program include:
San Francisco International (SFO)
Kansas City International (MCI)
Orlando Sanford International (SFB)
Jackson Hole (JAC)
Bozeman Yellowstone (BZN)
Key West (EYW)
Plus 14 smaller regional airports
Those airports would not automatically join Gold+, but they offer a sense of the scale TSA is already working with.
The broader privatization push outlined in the Trump administration's FY2027 budget would also require all smaller Category III and IV airports to enroll in the existing SPP program, a move projected to save roughly $52 million. Gold+ goes further by targeting select airports with the expanded tech-ownership model.
Industry Day is scheduled for May 21 at TSA headquarters, and companies interested in bidding have until May 25 to submit written feedback on the draft Performance Work Statement. TSA says it plans to incorporate that feedback before issuing a formal solicitation, though no official timeline has been announced yet.
The contracts under consideration here are significant. TSA's evaluation framework requires bidders to prove they can sustain a 10-year integrated contract, making it clear the agency is not looking at this as a short-term pilot program. The financial stability requirements also suggest TSA wants large, durable partners capable of managing both staffing and technology over the long haul.
For travelers, the most honest assessment is probably this: the checkpoint experience itself may not feel dramatically different anytime soon. But behind the scenes, the structural shift is substantial. Private companies would own and operate both the workforce and the screening technology, while TSA remains the regulator overseeing standards and compliance. Whether that ultimately translates into faster innovation, smoother security lines, or fewer technology bottlenecks is still very much an open question. The procurement process unfolding now will likely determine whether Gold+ becomes a niche experiment or the future direction of airport security in the United States.
TSA Gold+ is a public-private partnership program that expands on the existing Screening Partnership Program (SPP). Under Gold+, private contractors would manage both the screening workforce and the technology at select U.S. airports, while TSA retains regulatory oversight and security standard-setting.
Under the current SPP, TSA owns the screening equipment and private companies supply workers. Gold+ goes further by giving contractors responsibility for both the workforce and the technology, including procurement, deployment, and maintenance of checkpoint and baggage screening systems.
No specific airports have been publicly confirmed for Gold+. The 20 airports currently participating in the existing SPP include San Francisco International, Kansas City International, and a mix of smaller regional airports. Participation in Gold+ would be voluntary.
The security rules travelers already know remain in place, since those standards are set by federal law and TSA policy regardless of who staffs the checkpoint. Travelers at SPP or Gold+ airports might notice different uniforms, but the screening process itself should feel largely similar.
TSA faces major financial pressure. Passenger volume has grown significantly over the past decade, equipment maintenance costs have roughly doubled, and recent government shutdowns left federal TSA workers without pay. Screeners at privately operated SPP airports continued receiving paychecks because their contracts are pre-funded.
Yes. Airports can choose whether to participate. Airports that do not opt in would continue operating under standard TSA arrangements.
TSA is evaluating proposals for 10-year integrated contracts. Industry Day is scheduled for May 21, 2026, with written feedback on the draft framework due May 25. A formal solicitation timeline has not yet been announced.
No. TSA would continue setting security standards, conducting inspections and audits, and certifying all equipment and procedures regardless of who operates the checkpoint.